
MICHAEL BURRY’S SCION ASSET MANAGEMENT Q3 2025 PORTFOLIO
Scion Asset Management, a hedge fund managed by Michael Burry, disclosed 8 positions in its Q3 2025 13F filing, with a total portfolio value of $1,381,198,076โa dramatic 138.8% increase from Q2.
The portfolio is now dominated by PUT options against AI stocks, with $1.1 billion (79.5%) betting against Palantir and NVIDIAโrepresenting one of the most concentrated contrarian positions in modern investing history.
Michael Burry’s Portfolio
Michael Burry’s Q3 2025 portfolio reveals yet another dramatic transformationโthis time representing his most aggressive bearish stance on artificial intelligence stocks in history. With a staggering $1.1 billion bet against Palantir and NVIDIA, Burry has positioned himself as the most prominent AI skeptic in the market. His portfolio has more than doubled from Q2’s $578.3 million to approximately $1.38 billion, with 79.5% concentrated in PUT options betting against the AI boom.
Historic AI Short: Burry has placed $912.1 million in PUT options against Palantir (66% of total portfolio) and $186.6 million against NVIDIA (13.5%), representing the largest concentrated bet against AI stocks by any major investor. This is reminiscent of his 2005-2008 housing short in scale and conviction.
Top Holdings Breakdown
Strategic Analysis
Portfolio Concentration Risk: With 66% of his portfolio in a single PUT position against Palantir and nearly 80% in AI-related shorts, Burry’s Q3 portfolio represents extreme concentration. This level of conviction typically precedes either spectacular success or significant losses.
Burry’s massive PUT positions against Palantir and NVIDIA represent a clear thesis: artificial intelligence stocks have entered bubble territory. The concentration in Palantir is particularly strikingโthe stock trades at astronomical valuations relative to traditional metrics, and Burry appears to be betting that reality will eventually catch up to these valuations.
This mirrors his 2005-2008 housing short in both conviction level and contrarian positioning. At that time, he was also largely alone in his bearish stance, and the market thought his positions were irrational until they weren’t.
From Q2 to Q3, Burry eliminated virtually his entire portfolio and rebuilt it from scratch. Gone are:
- UnitedHealth Group calls ($109.2M)
- Regeneron calls ($105M)
- Meta Platforms calls ($73.8M)
- Alibaba and JD.com calls ($61M combined)
- Estรฉe Lauder positions ($52.5M)
- ASML, V.F. Corp, and others
This represents perhaps his most dramatic quarterly repositioning ever, suggesting he saw an urgent need to establish his AI short thesis.
Beyond his AI shorts, Burry’s bullish positions reveal a “back to basics” approach:
- Big Pharma over Biotech: Pfizer calls replace Regeneron, suggesting preference for stability over growth
- Energy Services: Halliburton calls indicate bullishness on traditional energy
- Medicaid over Commercial Health: Molina replaces UnitedHealth, focusing on government-backed healthcare
- Financial Services: SLM Corp adds exposure to consumer lending
This pattern suggests Burry believes the market will rotate from growth/tech to value/old economy as AI valuations correct.
With 90.1% of his portfolio in options (both puts and calls), Burry is using maximum leverage to express his views. The PUT options against Palantir and NVIDIA provide asymmetric payoffsโif he’s right about an AI bubble burst, the returns could be exponential. The CALL options on Pfizer and Halliburton similarly provide leveraged exposure to his bullish theses.
This aggressive use of derivatives suggests Burry believes we’re at a critical market inflection point where significant moves are imminent.
The Bruker preferred stock position is fascinatingโit provides 6.375% income while the rest of his portfolio consists of volatile options positions. This suggests Burry wants some cash flow generation to potentially fund option positions or simply to hedge against the binary nature of his other bets.
Why Palantir specifically as his largest position? Several possibilities:
- Valuation Extreme: PLTR trades at valuations that imply near-perfect execution for decades
- Government Dependency: Heavy reliance on government contracts creates concentration risk
- Competition: The AI space is becoming increasingly crowded with well-funded competitors
- Narrative-Driven: Stock price seems driven more by AI enthusiasm than current fundamentals
Burry may see Palantir as the clearest expression of AI exuberanceโsimilar to how certain mortgage securities were the clearest expression of housing bubble excess.
Historical Context
Q1 2025: Burry was bearish on tech with PUT options on NVIDIA and Chinese stocks. Portfolio value: $199.2M
Q2 2025: Complete reversal to bullish with healthcare, consumer, and tech CALL options. Portfolio value: $578.3M
Q3 2025: Another complete reversalโmassive AI shorts dominate, with 79.5% in PUT options. Portfolio value: $1.38B
Pattern Recognition: Burry’s quarterly reversals might seem erratic, but they could also indicate active trading around his core theses. He may have profited significantly from Q1 tech shorts (as tech corrected), then from Q2 tech calls (as tech rallied), and is now positioning for what he believes will be a major AI correction.
Conclusion
Michael Burry’s Q3 2025 portfolio represents one of the boldest contrarian bets in modern investing history. With $1.1 billion betting against AI stocksโparticularly the $912 million Palantir shortโBurry has taken a position that will either be remembered as prescient genius or catastrophic hubris.
The concentration of this bet is extraordinary: 66% of his portfolio in a single PUT position is a level of conviction rarely seen outside his famous housing short. This suggests Burry believes we are witnessing a bubble comparable to 2000 tech or 2008 housing, with AI valuations having completely disconnected from reality.
His complementary bullish positions in old economy stalwartsโPfizer, Halliburton, Molina Healthcareโpaint a picture of his worldview: capital will rotate from speculative AI plays to established businesses with actual cash flows and reasonable valuations.
The critical question is timing. Bubbles can persist longer than portfolios can remain solvent, and PUT options have expiration dates. If Burry is early (as he was with housing), he may face significant mark-to-market losses before ultimately being proven right. If he’s wrong, the losses could be devastating given the concentration.
What’s certain is that Burry is “all in” on his AI bubble thesis. His 238% portfolio increase from Q2 to Q3, combined with the extreme concentration in AI shorts, represents perhaps his highest-conviction macro bet since 2008. For investors and market observers, this portfolio serves as a stark reminder that even amid AI euphoria, one of history’s most successful contrarian investors is positioned for the opposite outcome.
The Big Short 2.0 is now in play. Only time will tell if history repeats itself.
Scion Asset Management Portfolio Analysis
Based on 13F filing for reporting period: Q3, 2025
Portfolio Manager
Michael J. Burry
Filing Date
November 3, 2025
Total Value
$1,381,198,076
Number of Positions
8
Q2 to Q3 Change
+138.8%
Portfolio Allocation
Holdings Breakdown
| Rank | Company Name | % of Portfolio | Ticker | Position Type | Total Shares | Market Value ($) |
|---|






